Developer.com content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may earn money when you click on links to our partners. Find out more.
Multithreading is a powerful concept in Java, which allows programs to execute multiple threads simultaneously. However, this capability places the burden of managing synchronization, ensuring that threads do not interfere with each other and produce unexpected results, on the developer. Thread synchronization errors can be elusive and difficult to detect, making them a common source of errors in multithreaded Java applications. This guide describes the different types of thread synchronization errors and offers suggestions for fixing them.
Jump to:
Race conditions
AND race condition occurs when program behavior depends on the relative timing of events, such as the order in which threads are scheduled to execute. This can lead to unpredictable results and data corruption. Consider the following example:
public class RaceConditionExample private static int counter = 0; public static void main(String[] args) Runnable incrementTask = () -> for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) counter++; ; Thread thread1 = new Thread(incrementTask); Thread thread2 = new Thread(incrementTask); thread1.start(); thread2.start(); try thread1.join(); thread2.join(); catch (InterruptedException e) e.printStackTrace(); System.out.println("Counter: " + counter);
In this example, two threads increment a shared counter variable. Due to the lack of synchronization, a race condition occurs, and the final value of the counter is unpredictable. To fix this, we can use synchronized key word:
public class FixedRaceConditionExample private static int counter = 0; public static synchronized void increment() for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) counter++; public static void main(String[] args) Thread thread1 = new Thread(FixedRaceConditionExample::increment); Thread thread2 = new Thread(FixedRaceConditionExample::increment); thread1.start(); thread2.start(); try thread1.join(); thread2.join(); catch (InterruptedException e) e.printStackTrace(); System.out.println("Counter: " + counter);
Use synchronized keyword on growth method ensures that only one thread can execute at a time, thus preventing a race condition.
Detecting race conditions requires careful analysis of your code and understanding the interactions between threads. Always use synchronization mechanisms such as synchronized methods or blocks, to protect shared resources and avoid race conditions.
Dead spots
Dead spots occur when two or more threads are permanently blocked, each waiting for the other to release the block. This situation may stop your application. Let’s consider a classic example of deadlock:
public class DeadlockExample { private static final Object lock1 = new Object(); private static final Object lock2 = new Object(); public static void main(String[] args) Thread thread1 = new Thread(() -> synchronized (lock1) System.out.println("Thread 1: Holding lock 1"); try Thread.sleep(100); catch (InterruptedException e) e.printStackTrace(); System.out.println("Thread 1: Waiting for lock 2"); synchronized (lock2) System.out.println("Thread 1: Holding lock 1 and lock 2"); ); Thread thread2 = new Thread(() -> synchronized (lock2) System.out.println("Thread 2: Holding lock 2"); try Thread.sleep(100); catch (InterruptedException e) e.printStackTrace(); System.out.println("Thread 2: Waiting for lock 1"); synchronized (lock1) System.out.println("Thread 2: Holding lock 2 and lock 1"); ); thread1.start(); thread2.start(); }
In this example, Thread 1 hold lock 1 and waits lock2while Thread 2 hold lock2 and waits lock 1. This results in a deadlock because neither thread can continue.
To avoid deadlocks, ensure that threads always acquire locks in the same order. If multiple locks are required, use a consistent order to obtain them. Here’s a modified version of the previous example that avoids deadlock:
public class FixedDeadlockExample { private static final Object lock1 = new Object(); private static final Object lock2 = new Object(); public static void main(String[] args) Thread thread1 = new Thread(() -> synchronized (lock1) System.out.println("Thread 1: Holding lock 1"); try Thread.sleep(100); catch (InterruptedException e) e.printStackTrace(); System.out.println("Thread 1: Waiting for lock 2"); synchronized (lock2) System.out.println("Thread 1: Holding lock 2"); ); Thread thread2 = new Thread(() -> synchronized (lock1) System.out.println("Thread 2: Holding lock 1"); try Thread.sleep(100); catch (InterruptedException e) e.printStackTrace(); System.out.println("Thread 2: Waiting for lock 2"); synchronized (lock2) System.out.println("Thread 2: Holding lock 2"); ); thread1.start(); thread2.start(); }
In this fixed version, both threads acquire locks in the same order: first lock 1then lock2. This eliminates the possibility of downtime.
Preventing deadlock involves carefully designing your locking strategy. Always acquire locks in a consistent order to avoid circular dependencies between threads. Use tools like thread dump and profiler to identify and troubleshoot deadlocks in your Java programs. Also, consider reading our guide on how to prevent thread deadlocks in Java for even more strategies.
Starvation
Starvation occurs when a thread cannot get regular access to shared resources and cannot progress. This can happen when a thread with a lower priority consistently takes precedence over a thread with a higher priority. Consider the following code example:
public class StarvationExample { private static final Object lock = new Object(); public static void main(String[] args) Thread highPriorityThread = new Thread(() -> while (true) synchronized (lock) System.out.println("High Priority Thread is working"); ); Thread lowPriorityThread = new Thread(() -> while (true) synchronized (lock) System.out.println("Low Priority Thread is working"); ); highPriorityThread.setPriority(Thread.MAX_PRIORITY); lowPriorityThread.setPriority(Thread.MIN_PRIORITY); highPriorityThread.start(); lowPriorityThread.start(); }
In this example, we have a high-priority thread and a low-priority thread that are both fighting for a lock. The high priority thread dominates and the low priority thread experiences starvation.
To mitigate starvation, you can use fair locks or adjust thread priorities. Here is an updated version using a ReentrantLock with honesty flag enabled:
import java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock; import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock; public class FixedStarvationExample { // The true boolean value enables fairness private static final Lock lock = new ReentrantLock(true); public static void main(String[] args) Thread highPriorityThread = new Thread(() -> while (true) lock.lock(); try System.out.println("High Priority Thread is working"); finally lock.unlock(); ); Thread lowPriorityThread = new Thread(() -> while (true) lock.lock(); try System.out.println("Low Priority Thread is working"); finally lock.unlock(); ); highPriorityThread.setPriority(Thread.MAX_PRIORITY); lowPriorityThread.setPriority(Thread.MIN_PRIORITY); highPriorityThread.start(); lowPriorityThread.start(); }
The ReentrantLock with honesty ensures that the longest waiting thread gets the lock, reducing the likelihood of starvation.
Starvation mitigation involves carefully considering thread priorities, using fair locks, and ensuring that all threads have equal access to shared resources. Regularly review and adjust your thread priorities based on your application’s requirements.
See our threading best practices guide for Java applications.
Data inconsistency
Data inconsistency occurs when multiple threads access shared data without proper synchronization, leading to unexpected and incorrect results. Consider the following example:
public class DataInconsistencyExample private static int sharedValue = 0; public static void main(String[] args) Runnable incrementTask = () -> for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) sharedValue++; ; Thread thread1 = new Thread(incrementTask); Thread thread2 = new Thread(incrementTask); thread1.start(); thread2.start(); try thread1.join(); thread2.join(); catch (InterruptedException e) e.printStackTrace(); System.out.println("Shared Value: " + sharedValue);
In this example, two threads increment a common value without synchronizing. As a result, the final value of the shared value is unpredictable and inconsistent.
To resolve data inconsistency issues, you can use synchronized keywords or other synchronization mechanisms:
public class FixedDataInconsistencyExample private static int sharedValue = 0; public static synchronized void increment() for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) sharedValue++; public static void main(String[] args) Thread thread1 = new Thread(FixedDataInconsistencyExample::increment); Thread thread2 = new Thread(FixedDataInconsistencyExample::increment); thread1.start(); thread2.start(); try thread1.join(); thread2.join(); catch (InterruptedException e) e.printStackTrace(); System.out.println("Shared Value: " + sharedValue);
Use synchronized keyword on growth method ensures that only one thread can execute at a time, preventing data inconsistency.
To avoid data inconsistency, always synchronize access to shared data. Use synchronized keywords or other synchronization mechanisms to protect critical parts of the code. Regularly review your code for potential data inconsistency issues, especially in multi-threaded environments.
Final thoughts on detecting and fixing thread synchronization errors in Java
In this Java tutorial, we have explored practical examples of each type of thread synchronization error and provided solutions to fix them. Thread synchronization errors, such as race conditions, deadlocks, starvation, and data inconsistency, can introduce subtle bugs that are hard to find. However, by incorporating the strategies presented here into your Java code, you can improve the stability and performance of your multithreaded applications.
Read: The best online courses for Java