3 Ways Apple’s Antitrust Lawsuit Could Change the iPhone Experience for Fans

By Samantha Murphy Kelly | CNN

When Apple launched its first Mac computer in 1984, with its iconic “hello” greeting in the form of a Mac smiley face, it wanted to stand out in the nascent PC market. The Mac was affordable with its friendly, innovative design—Apple’s way of setting the Mac apart in the confusing PC landscape.

That consumer-friendly mantra persists today, with Apple carefully cultivating a lightweight yet controlled user experience across all of its products, including the billions of iPhones in use around the world.

But the Biden administration believes Apple took it too far. On Thursday, the Justice Department sued Apple for illegally monopolizing the smartphone market. At the press conference, the government provided a long list of ways Apple allegedly destroyed competition with restrictive app store terms, high fees and its “walled garden” approach, limiting how third-party companies interact with its brands and services.

The company has denied the lawsuit’s allegations and said it plans to fight them. Apple added that the lawsuit could empower the government to “take a heavy hand in designing human technology.”

But if successful, the lawsuit could affect Apple’s products and services. While the suit could last for years, here’s a closer look at what it could mean for iPhone users:

Changes in the App Store

If found liable, the company could be forced to change a number of things.

One such change is how iPhone users can gain greater access to “super apps” that were previously largely restricted. The term refers to one-stop-shop applications that enable messaging, food ordering, payment processing and other capabilities within a single platform.

According to Dipanjan Chatterjee, principal analyst at market research firm Forrester, super apps are the biggest threat to Apple’s supremacy in the lives of its users.

“An offering like WeChat, dubbed China’s app for everything, can provide an alternative to Apple’s ecosystem for people to communicate, bank, share memories, chat with businesses and more,” he said. “What Apple fears most is becoming irrelevant to its customers.”

At the same time, super apps like WeChat are being created by larger companies and could therefore put some smaller companies at a disadvantage. And the concept is not very welcome in the US anyway.

The US government, however, may argue that the lack of interest could be due to Apple’s large share of the smartphone market and its reluctance to offer cool apps in its store, Chatterjee said.

Better interoperability

Apple may also be required to offer more support for cross-platform messaging, an issue the company has previously said it is already working on.

The company lets iPhone users send high-quality photos and videos to each other, but similar texts for Android phones are slower and grainier. It also perpetuates these messages in green bubbles, creating a kind of class divide, critics argue.

In November, the company said it would add new features, such as read receipts, typing indicators, better support for group chats and better media sharing of images and videos, across all platforms to close the gap. Apple’s move to add support for a standard called RCS (Rich Communications Services) is set to roll out later this year. RCS is considered a replacement for alternatives such as SMS or text messaging, and can work over Wi-Fi and mobile data.

The change follows pressure from both regulators and competitors to keep more operating systems running smoothly. The European Union’s Digital Markets Act, for example, requires companies to make their core services interoperable between platforms. The US government could demand the same.

More open services

Another likely change is how third-party hardware, such as smartwatches, will communicate with a range of Apple devices and software, including the iPhone and Apple services such as Fitness+. The company also required Apple Watch users to own iOS devices to keep them locked into its existing ecosystem.

Chatterjee said this change would have both positive and negative sides.

“The end result would be somewhere along the spectrum of access to more and cheaper options, but also devaluing the user experience that Apple’s customers value so highly,” he said.

The Biden administration also railed against Apple’s lack of support for mobile cloud services. Loosening this could allow users to access games and other cloud-based applications without paying for expensive hardware.

Within the discussion

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *